In its just-released 'Strategic risk outlook 2015' the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) explains clearly why money types tend to rate poorly in the annual most-trusted surveys.
"When conflicts of interest are combined with information asymmetries, it can be difficult for investors to know whether a market participant is acting in their best interests," the FMA report says. "Remuneration and incentive arrangements can also reinforce conflicts of interest, particularly when sales staff are remunerated on a volume basis or through certain bonus structures."
As well as oddly-shaped information, the FMA warns investors also have to be aware of other geometric tricks of the finance trade, particularly the dreaded "vertically integrated distribution models" (as popularised in recent Australian financial investigations).
The regulator has promised to straighten out some of the vertically integrated kinks next year through an "entity based monitoring" program that will focus on "remuneration arrangements" such as "certain volume-based incentives, up-front commissions and trail commissions".
These are particularly damaging when "the profit-making interests of the market participant are put ahead of the interests of investors", the FMA report says.