And it seems that, almost five year since the FAA regulatory regime kicked in, the AFA numbers are, at best, stagnant.
The FMA records 1,921 AFAs on its register, down from a peak of just under 2,000 in 2012.
However, according to my exhaustive study of the market, only 1,895 people are currently registered as AFAs.
As the report shows, that 1,895 figure does not represent the true number of advisers qualified to give broad investment advice.
By my reckoning (based on a painstaking trawl through the FMA data and elsewhere) there are most likely only 1,260-odd 'investment advisers' in New Zealand.
Most AFAs, too, are housed in financial institutions, rather than independent operations. My research shows that AMP, banks and stockbroking firms together account for about half of the total AFA market.
I could identify only 129 AFAs linked to what could be described as 'non-aligned' financial advisory firms. As well, my study categorised 416 AFAs as 'self-employed', of which only 172 appeared to specialise in investments (the majority in this category were insurance-based advisers).
New Zealand investors are routinely advised by government authorities, market commentators and prospectuses to 'seek independent financial advice' before doing anything stupid with their money: but where do you go to find it?