It could be that fund managers are philosophically opposed to collective action, or perhaps too busy competing to worry about joint lobbying initiatives or articulating an industry code of conduct.
Despite the lack of historical precedents, though, a new group of like-minded fund managers has just banded together to collaborate on issues of common concern.
Dubbed the Boutique Fund Managers Forum (BFMF), the group's membership is a unique subset of what is already a fairly low-profile industry.
The BFMF list includes (but is not limited to): Mint Asset Management; Pathfinder Asset Management; Elevation Capital; Pie Funds; Goldman Henry Capital Management; King Tide Asset Management, and; Diversified Investment Strategies.
According to Rebecca Thomas, Mint chief, the BFMF has set some membership rules that adhere to its definition of the term 'boutique'.
Thomas says members can't have more than $300 million under management and must also be owned by the principals in the business, which excludes a few other boutique contenders.
She says the BFMF has already met a couple of times to plot its purpose, which may include joint lobbying of government, preparing for the upcoming licensing regime etc.
At the very least, the BFMF might be able to highlight that there's more to the New Zealand funds management industry than Australian sideshows.