In the same time period our 10 year bond yield has risen by 47 per cent from 3.22 per cent to the current level of 4.7 per cent. This compares to a 104 per cent rise in the US bond yield. What will happen next.... historic correlations might be of some use here - check out the graph which compares US 10 year government bond yields with NZ 10 year government bond yields.
At the moment NZ bond yields are 1.7 per cent higher than US bond yields, having averaged a margin of 1.5 per cent above US interest rates since 1993, getting as high as 3.0 per cent above comparable US yields in 2008 and actually going below US rates by 0.5 per cent in 1994. NZ's inflation prospects are arguably no worse than those of the US and NZ's government borrowings as a percentage of GDP are much more favourable than those of the US so it is conceivable that US interest rates may rise further without local interest rates following them.
Conceivable yes but is it likely? There are opposing forces. The US benefits from getting the risk free bid because Uncle Sam is perceived to be about the best credit there is and NZ has a far less impressive history in controlling inflation than the US has. But that is the rear view what matters is the road ahead and NZ bonds offering a real yield well above that of US bonds must look attractive to US pension funds especially given we haven't been doing any quantitative easing.
An alternate way of getting a view as to whether local long term bonds offer value at present is to compare their returns with inflation. With NZ 10 year government bonds yielding 4.7 per cent and inflation forecast to be around 2 per cent that looks a reasonable real return relative to international alternatives. However since 1993 NZ 10 year bond yields have averaged 6.2 per cent and inflation 2.2 per cent so that means the average spread over inflation has been 4.0 per cent which is quite a bit higher than the current 2.7 per cent spread so, if history is any guide, and that itself is anyone's guess, NZ 10 year bond yields could rise a bit further ... but then again they might not.
How does the current 1 per cent spread of US bonds over inflation compare with the US historic data? Martin Feldstein, Professor of Economics at Harvard, in an article the other day, forecast that US interest rates were going to keep rising. He said that at around 3 per cent long term US government bonds only offer a real return of 1 per cent and past experience suggests that a 2 per cent real rate of return is required meaning that US 10 year bonds will go to 4 per cent.
He is actually more bearish than that when he says that "the large budget deficit and the rising level of the national debt suggest that the real rate will be higher than 2 per cent and nominal rates could rise to 5 per cent". Being a Harvard professor he has a good knowledge of history and points out that the US 10 year rate doubled from 4 per cent in the 1960s to 8 per cent in the 70s. Those were however extraordinary times with the Vietnam war highly inflationary. Mr Feldstein stresses the fact that the greatest risk to government bond holders is, besides default, that inflation will rise pushing up interest rates on long term bonds and he thus suggests inflation indexed bonds as an option which would of course protect against inflation but do not protect against a rise in real interest rates.
The future, as always, is uncertain. We could have inflation or we could all be looking in the wrong direction and deflation might be round the corner. The key to owning a bond portfolio and sleeping at night is to avoid sticking your neck out too far but instead adopt the strategy employed by fund managers who have one eye on duration risk and the other on career risk. When they make presentations to clients they sound confident, implying they know where interest rates are going, but in reality they don't so they hedge their bets by having some short term bonds in which case they will look clever if interest rates rise and some long term bonds just in case they fall.
Now we will finish with something humorous from the Extremely Bad Timing File. Nigel Tate, Grand Wizard of the Institute of Financial Advisors (IFA) was reported the other day as saying, in an article entitled "Take Any Chance To Build Public Image", that "NZers had a bad impression of advisors because of stories like Ross Asset Management" and "advisors needed to take every opportunity to turn that around". Good stuff from Nigel but barely 24 hours later one of his IFA disciples was charged by the Serious Fraud Office and the Financial Markets Authority for allegedly stealing $3m of client's money. As they say, "Karma is a Bitch".
Brent Sheather is an Authorised Financial Adviser. A disclosure statement is available upon request.