"From a personal and economic point of view, it makes sense that these people should be given a helping hand," read the document that was first reported by Bloomberg.
"Those who are lucky enough to be in a position to 'disconnect' themselves from the face-to-face economy owe it to them."
The team found that once the pandemic passes more than half of those who have tried out working from home want to continue it permanently for between two and three days a week.
Those staff will save money on travel, lunch and socialising, the economists said, while also contributing less to the infrastructure of the economy.
"That is a big problem for the economy as it has taken decades and centuries to build up the wider business and economic infrastructure that supports face-to-face working," the report said.
The idea is that employers would pay the levy if they don't provide staff with a desk, whereas if the worker chooses to work from home they would be taxed for each day they did so.
In the US, the strategists argue that the tax could pay for a $1,500 grant to the 29m workers who earn under $30,000 a year and are unable to work from home.
- Telegraph