DuluxGroup, the ASX-listed paint manufacturer, took a $15.2 million provision, including $8.9 million in cash, to settle its tax dispute with New Zealand's Inland Revenue Department over subsidiary Alesco NZ's use of optional convertible notes.
As well as the cash provision included in the paint maker's provision there was also a $6.3 million in a "reversal of provision", according to Alesco's 2014 financial statements lodged with the Companies Office.
In February 2014, Dulux reached a confidential settlement with the tax collector over the use of its convertible notes several days before a hearing in the Supreme Court. At the time, Dulux said the settlement was likely to be less than the $12.7 million provision in its accounts as at September 30 2013.
Read also:
• Alesco tax test case settled
• Companies likely to follow Alesco's lead, say tax experts
The company used instruments known as optional convertible notes to fund acquisitions because tax deductions on the New Zealand side of the Tasman weren't countered by an offsetting tax derived from income in Australia.