Scherr stressed that bank was still pursuing its medium-term targets on efficiency, though progress on a three-year US$1.3b cost saving plan would not be seen until the second half of the year.
"I think it is the right message as nobody knows the outcome of how revenues will look like through the rest of the year," said Kian Abouhossein, analyst at JPMorgan. "The message is positive as it illustrates cost flexibility in case revenues decline."
Goldman's investment banking revenue rose 25 per cent year on year, beating its peers, while its trading powerhouse posted a 28 per cent rise in revenues in the first quarter, including the best quarter for fixed income trading in five years.
Solomon said clients continued to be "very, very active" in the early part of the second quarter, although there was "no guarantee obviously that continues as we go through the quarter".
Glenn Schorr, analyst at Evercore ISI, said Goldman's results were "a little bit better than expectations", thanks to investment banking revenues and fixed income trading. He added that Goldman "will have to weather a near-term fall-off in capital markets revenues as markets normalise".
Overall, Goldman did better than the 69 per cent drop in net income at JPMorgan Chase and the 46 per cent fall for Citigroup. "It's just business mix," said Marty Mosby, analyst at Vining Sparks, noting that the capital markets areas that Goldman has heavy exposure to "did so well" in the first quarter, while credit losses would be bigger at the universal banks.
Bucking the trend, Goldman shares rose 1.7 per cent to about US$181 each in New York trading on Wednesday, while its main street counterparts were weaker.
Written by: Laura Noonan
© Financial Times