Debate about oil and gas exploration in New Zealand is polarised. One group sees only economic benefits. Government policy is driven by this group because our leaders see the world in that narrow way.
They dismiss environmental concerns as overblown and have even made it unlawful to protest up close. The other group emphasises the economic benefits that are claimed are more than offset by the environmental risks of drilling, fracking and production.
Both groups are wrong because they ignore the ample evidence that claims of economic benefits are imaginary. Both have assumed that buoyant global markets will be there in the future for any oil and gas produced. This thinking is dangerously astray, for three reasons.
First, New Zealand's future oil and gas will be high-cost. Our oil and gas fields that were relatively cheap to exploit are already in production. That is why they were developed first. In contrast, most of the new sources would incur much higher costs in both development and production.
Second, global energy costs will soar within the next seven to 10 years. This will happen because low-cost oil and gas fields are already exhausted or are nearing depletion. There are huge reserves of both oil and gas, and more are being discovered, but these are all sources such as deep ocean wells, tar sands and tight deposits that require fracking, all of which require much higher-cost production methods.