"Creating any industrial undertaking, particularly one of this magnitude, will have an environmental impact; however, these impacts and risks can be managed to an acceptable level."
Woodside is planning one of the world's biggest liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing plants at James Price Point, where up to 50 million tonnes of LNG a year from the Browse basin will be produced.
Opponents argue the gas hub will destroy James Price Point's cultural and environmental integrity and transform the tourist town into an expensive resources centre.
Environmentalists and leading paleontologist, the University of Queensland's Steve Salisbury, also fear near-shore geotechnical surveys being undertaken by Woodside may encroach on nearby dinosaur tracks.
Most of the footprints are exposed only at extreme low tide in the intertidal zone on the boundary of the West Kimberley National Heritage site.
Woodside has argued that the surveying work posed no risk.
Vogel said the EPA believed that to protect the dinosaur prints, the gas development should not cross the shore within 900m of James Price Point. It also wants extra surveys to be carried out to determine if more dinosaur prints exist.
"If fossils are found, disturbance should be avoided where possible.
"Where disturbance cannot reasonably be avoided, appropriate recovery work to salvage or properly document fossils prior to disturbance should be undertaken under the guidance of an expert and with the advice and participation of traditional owners."
Vogel also said turbidity from dredging, oil spills, industrial discharges, noise, light and vessel strikes could adversely affect whales, dolphins, turtles, dugong and fish.
However, he said the 29 conditions recommended by the EPA would help limit the impact on marine fauna.
Included were limitations on marine pile-driving and blasting to protect humpback whales, and measures to protect seabed habitats and monsoon vine-thicket vegetation.
- AAP
