The article by Liam Dann in the Herald on August 25, "TV war not so fierce in real world", caught my eye.
His premise was social change doesn't always keep up with the pace of technological change and therefore it is difficult to pick when something like internet TV will take off. Liam argued, "Any new trend can be extrapolated to its ultimate conclusion within minutes. Meanwhile, a large, conservative and valuable chunk of the public is much slower to change its behaviour."
He's right in one sense, but I found this quite a brave call, particularly given the catalytic impact of the internet. History shows disruptive forces usually overtake market incumbents in a relatively short time. Just think about companies like Kodak, Encyclopaedia Britannica and the Yellow Pages. Or even newer products like CDs, digital cameras, desktop computers, and the home telephone ...the list of legacy products being replaced is endless.
Those who fight the future often get run over by it. Those who embrace it at least play a role in shaping it.
This process isn't new but the pace of evolution is accelerating, driven by ubiquitous internet, smartphones and data-hungry applications. From AM radio, to TV, to the internet to mobile internet, the rate of adoption has accelerated. Just a decade ago, millions of people changed their music listening behaviour because of Apple. Digital cameras have been quickly supplanted by mobile phones with cameras. News coverage has transformed because everything can be published in real time on social platforms. People are fundamentally changing their relationship with technology in a very short period of time.