This doesn't make Italy unique - the euro has hurt even the best-run countries - but what does is that Italy's populists have noticed. Why is that? Well, more than anything else, the common currency has given Europe a severe case of cognitive dissonance. People hate austerity, but they love the euro even more - they have an emotional attachment to everything it stands for.
The problem, though, is that the euro is the reason they have to slash their budgets so much in the first place. So anti-austerity parties have felt like they have to promise the impossible if they want any hope of gaining power: that they can end the budget cuts without ending the country's euro membership.
But as Greece's Syriza party found out, that strategy, if you want to call it one, only gives your people unrealistic expectations and Europe no reason to help you out. The other countries, after all, don't want to reward what, in their view, is bad budgetary behaviour, if not blackmail. And so Greece was all but given an ultimatum: either leave the euro or do even more austerity than it was originally told to do. It chose austerity.
Read also:
• Editorial: Greek crisis advances European unity
• Tsipras moves from predator to prey at euro 'torture' summit
The lesson was clear. Don't elect anti-austerity parties, or things will get even worse for you. But, in Italy at least, the anti-austerity parties have learned the opposite lesson.
It's the old saying: if you owe the bank 100 euros, that's your problem, but if you owe the bank 2 trillion euros, that's their problem.
Don't rule out leaving the euro, or things will never get better for you. Beppe Grillo, the comedian-turned-politician at the head of Italy's second-most popular party, the Five Star Movement, has gone from being a vague euroskeptic to an outspoken one. He wrote that Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsispras' "refusal to exit the euro was his death sentence" and that Italy should use its debt "as an advantage that allows us to be on the offensive in any future negotiations." It's the old saying: if you owe the bank 100 euros, that's your problem, but if you owe the bank 2 trillion euros, that's their problem.
As far as problems go, that's a pretty big one. It wouldn't be quite so large, though, if Italy would actually start growing again. More income would mean less of a debt burden, and, in turn, less need for austerity. But it's just hard to see how that would happen.
Italy's government still has to cut its budget, and its companies still have to cut their costs to become more competitive, both of which will hurt growth in the short-term. And, in the meantime, Italy's anti-austerity party is the only one in Europe willing to point out that the emperor has no growth.
People might notice that it's true.
O'Brien is a reporter for Wonkblog covering economic affairs. He was previously a senior associate editor at The Atlantic.