Twitter has been in disarray as the company adjusts to a new reality under Musk, who closed his US$44 billion buyout of the firm last week. Musk immediately fired Twitter’s CEO, chief financial officer and others, before moving quickly to install close confidants and trusted engineers from his other companies at the social media firm.
Since then, Musk and his advisers have been working on product changes and major cuts to Twitter’s rank and file. Managers at Twitter, which has about 7,500 employees, have said they are finalising lists of high- and low-performing workers, most likely with an eye toward layoffs. While several employees have already been let go, the timing and scope of mass layoffs remain fluid.
A Twitter spokesperson declined to comment. Musk did not respond to a request for comment. IPG did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A reporter for the tech and finance newsletter Morning Brew earlier tweeted IPG’s recommendation.
The executives who left Twitter in recent days include Sarah Personette, the chief customer officer who managed the company’s relationships with advertisers; Dalana Brand, the head of people and diversity; and Nick Caldwell, the executive responsible for core technologies like infrastructure. Their exits leave Twitter with few of the leaders it had before Musk closed the deal to own the company.
Personette met Musk last week to discuss Twitter’s advertising partnerships, she said in a tweet. After the meeting with Personette, Musk published an open letter to advertisers, saying that Twitter would not become a “free-for-all hellscape.” He also said Twitter would form a council to advise on content moderation.
In the tweet about her departure, Personette said she believed Musk’s team “understands the importance of holding up the standards” set by the Global Alliance for Responsible Media.
The coalition wrote in a blog post Monday that it was monitoring how Twitter planned to set up a panel to review content moderation. It said it would share its assessments with members in the advertising industry. Twitter has been part of the coalition since the group’s inception in 2019.
“Brand safety is non-negotiable for advertisers,” the group wrote.
IPG’s recommendation on pausing spending on Twitter follows an announcement from General Motors, which last week said it was temporarily suspending its advertising on Twitter. GM is a competitor of Musk’s electric vehicle company, Tesla. IPG, a holding company with several agencies handling advertising spending, has clients such as American Express, Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, Mattel and Spotify. Its Mediabrands division manages roughly US$40 billion in marketing investment globally.
Brand, who oversaw human resources and diversity initiatives at Twitter, said she had also resigned Friday. Caldwell announced his departure by updating his Twitter profile as a “former” Twitter executive. Three people familiar with the matter confirmed he had left the company.
Personette, Brand and Caldwell did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Musk and his team have also been working on changes to Twitter’s product, including potentially charging users US$20 to subscribe to its Twitter Blue service or lose the check mark badge that denotes verification.
After writer Stephen King tweeted Monday that he would leave the platform if the US$20 plan was implemented, Musk responded Tuesday that “we need to pay the bills somehow! Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How about $8?”
Musk later tweeted that he would adjust the price of Twitter Blue to US$8 per month. “Power to the people!” he wrote.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Kate Conger, Tiffany Hsu and Ryan Mac
©2022 THE NEW YORK TIMES