"No matter what Musk does, he knows his liability is capped at US$1b," said Daniel Rubin, a mergers and acquisitions attorney at Dechert, the US corporate law firm. The fee is just 2.27 per cent of the overall deal value, less than half the penalty a private equity firm would typically pay if it were to abandon a takeover, Rubin added.
The fee also obligates Twitter to pay Musk US$1b if it walks away from the takeover for reasons including regulatory issues or a higher bid from another buyer.
According to the merger contract, Twitter could sue Musk for failing to provide the equity financing after all other closing conditions have been met. However, the damages would be limited to US$1b.
"[I]n no event shall the Company be permitted or entitled to receive aggregate monetary damages in excess of the Parent Termination Fee," according to the contract.
Rubin said the termination fee was "not even close to the market" and was a "much . . . better deal for Musk" than Twitter.
Typically, private equity firms are liable to pay around 6 per cent or more of the deal value to the seller if they abandon a transaction.
The fee demanded by sellers jumped substantially after 2008 when several private equity firms who struck deals just prior to the onset of the financial crisis walked away from signed agreements.
"If I were the seller, I would demand a substantial reverse termination fee — if it is only 2.27 per cent, it doesn't strike me as very large," said Brian Quinn, an associate professor of law at Boston College.
Twitter declined to comment.
Written by: Antoine Gara, Sujeet Indap, Eric Platt and James Fontanella-Khan
© Financial Times