Aucklanders will not be fooled by a diversionary discussion about shifting the port from the Waitemata while the port company goes about extending its footprint further into the harbour. The Port Future Study was set up by the Auckland Council in response to the public outcry against wharf extensions and the success of an application to the High Court that found the council's consent to the extensions invalid.
The study was asked to look at other possible locations for the port. It contemplated just about every part of the region's coasts including places as unlikely as Long Bay and Muriwai.
It produced its conclusions on Thursday and its chosen sites are hardly less unlikely locations on the Manukau Harbour or the Firth of Thames. At least, these are the sites it recommends for further investigation before the port outgrows its present site sometime in the future.
In the meantime, it has given its blessing to an extension of Bledisloe Wharf for vehicle imports and other bulk cargo. Ports of Auckland is now once again contemplating pushing further into the harbour with an extension of Bledisloe. This is about two thirds the size of last year's proposal and the port company says it will be on piles, not a reclamation. This, it hopes, will be more acceptable.
This is local body election year and everyone concerned - the port company, council members, mayoral and council candidates and, not least, the voters - need to get real.