Both Europe and Australia, the only other parts of the world with ETS policies, have such caps in place.
Business and farm lobbyists argued against such a move, arguing a cap on the use of internationally sourced emissions credits would impose new costs on local businesses and households while interventions to counter temporarily low global carbon prices would violate market principles.
In the end, the Government rejected proposals for NZU proportions of between 10 per cent and 50 per cent of annual carbon credit requirements, to force purchase of NZUs.
This week's decisions have created pressure on large emitters to dump NZUs, which they had been stockpiling at current low prices in anticipation of increased carbon offset obligations. However, Climate Change Minister Tim Groser put those proposed increases on hold.
The decisions announced on Monday leave the ETS in a semi-permanent state of transition, with no changes to existing obligations on large emitter industries and no target date for including the agriculture sector in the scheme.
"The Government has had a number of options in respect of the changes they could have made," McClintock said. "In each case where they had a choice, they've favoured emitters."
The latest announcements would discourage further planting, yet the Government expected carbon farming to become a substantial source of offsets for future carbon liabilities.