An eminent computational scientist wrote in the Guardian this week that we, man and woman-kind, were "f***ed".
Apologies for the language, and the downer, but that is what Stephen Emmott wrote, decrying the "developed" world's tendency to use each and every of our natural resources to the point of extinction, and the "developing" world's tendency to grow populations beyond what its meagre reserves can handle. The planet will survive, Wilson said, but humankind is doomed.
This may be hopelessly glum to some, and junk science to others. Climate change deniers exist, but so do Kevin Rudd fans and those who believe Elvis still walks among us. Many of us will deny the overwhelming evidence that something very frightening - whether man-made or naturally occurring - is staring us in the face, until we are personally faced with mutant lepers thumping us over the head with severed limbs in order to reach our fresh water supplies.
In the face of this existential crisis of massive proportions, not to mention an ageing, cash-strapped population in many parts of the world, it seems entirely fitting that more and more people are trying to take control of the circumstances of their own deaths. Only a small part of this movement involves the topic of euthanasia. For the vast majority, the focus is on trying to understand what happens when you die - the physical reality of death - but also ways in which one can achieve as peaceful a death as possible in the circumstances.