While I love a good conspiracy story, it does seem Machiavellian of Mr Key to then, six months later, order the Ministry of Economic Development to call for "expressions of interest" from organisations interested in building such a facility.
Five interested parties responded: SkyCity, Ngati Whatua, which planned a building draped 6m above the Quay St rail corridor, infrastructure investor Infratil, with a development on its bus depot in the Wynyard Quarter, the ASB Showgrounds on its Epsom site and Auckland Council, with a proposal to convert the existing Aotea Centre.
Proposals had to be submitted by mid-June 2010.
Three months later, about the time it was expected the favoured bid would be announced, the first of the Christchurch earthquakes struck and the Government's attentions were instantly diverted southwards.
It was not until June last year that SkyCity was eventually declared the winner. By then the other contenders - and anyone with an ear to the ground - had a gut feeling the earthquakes had effectively knocked everyone but the casino operator out of the race. The rival bids all required Government financial input into the $350 million project - some as high as a 75 per cent contribution. SkyCity asked for no cash contribution.
But as Mr Key revealed at the time, nothing is for free. "The company has asked the Government to consider some alterations to gambling regulations and legislation." He added that "any changes to gambling regulations will be subject to a full public submissions process".
Now, 10 months later, the behind-the-scenes haggling is still going on. Reports are that SkyCity is holding out for permission to install up to 500 new pokie machines in its existing casino plus having its casino licence extended past 2021, as its price for the deal.
What the sticking points in the negotiations are have not been revealed, nor is what the Government will eventually subject to its full public submissions process.
In recent days a belated debate has erupted revealing strong public feeling that the social effects of flooding the Auckland market with extra pokie machines might be a price too high to pay. Opposition politicians have latched on to this mood and are running with it.
What they're not doing is addressing either the need for a national convention centre in the first place, and if the answer is yes, what is their alternative to one funded by Auckland's pokie addicts.
To me, if there is to be a convention centre, the only answer is the project encompassing and expanding the Aotea Centre.
Its central-city position within walking distance of hotels, restaurants and entertainment venues scored highly in the feasibility study assessment.
The plan is to incorporate the existing ASB Theatre as its main conference hall while expanding upwards and north along Mayoral Drive.
For ratepayers, this choice will protect the city's current investment in the convention business of the existing centre. If the new convention centre goes elsewhere, the Aotea's existing convention business could crash, leaving ratepayers with an underused millstone.
The icing on the cake is that as an integral part of the project, the moth-balled - and much missed - St James Theatre across Queen St would be restored as a 1200-seater venue for rock concerts, opera, ballet and drama.
This would make up for the loss of the larger ASB Theatre, which, to be honest, has always been a problematic space acoustically for entertainment, but would be excellent wired for large conference sessions.
It's good to see Opposition politicians badgering the Government over the ethics of funding a convention centre out of the personal misery of addicts, but I wish they'd also push for a positive alternative.
