"China wants a global position in a shipping just as in every industry."
Shares of Maersk, the world's biggest container line, fell 5.3 per cent to 13,290 kroner in Copenhagen on Tuesday, the steepest drop since May 16, 2012. That pared the 2014 gain to 13 per cent for a market value of 285 billion kroner ($52 billion).
The company accepts China's verdict and with no alternative plan in hand it will now "give up on P3," Andersen said. CMA CGM, based in Marseille, France, and MSC, which has its headquarters in Geneva, are both closely held.
"The surprise here is that China has not approved this plan even after regulators in the US and European Union have given it the goahead," said Lawrence Li, China transportation analyst at UOB Kay-Hian Investment Consulting in Shanghai. "And antitrust laws there are tougher."
Read also:
• Container juggle costly exercise
• Sea monsters - the world's biggest ships
The companies had planned to commit 255 vessels deployed on 29 trade loops to a joint center that would have run a combined fleet independently. Maersk was slated to contribute 42 per cent of the total, including its Triple-E class, the largest-ever container ships with a capacity of 18,000 boxes.
China's rejection of P3 comes after the US Federal Maritime Commission approved the alliance in March and the European Commission closed an EU antitrust probe this month.
Trade has been a mainstay of China's economic development since former leader Deng Xiaoping first opened up the nation more than three decades ago. It entered the World Trade Organisation in 2001, helping secure annual growth in excess of 10 per cent on average in the following decade.
While policymakers in the world's second-largest economy sought to reduce its reliance on commerce in the aftermath of the 2009 recession, exports remain a source of strength.
Shipments abroad advanced 7 per cent in May from a year earlier, with imports down 1.6 per cent, a government report showed. China recorded a $35.9 billion surplus for the month.
The Commerce Ministry said that the P3 plan might have benefited Maersk, MSC and CMA CGM at the expense of other operators, and that in "numerous discussions" the applicants had failed to show that the positive elements would outweigh any adverse impact. The three companies - which had always pitched the arrangement as "operational, not commercial" - control a combined 46.7 per cent market share, it said.
The "closely coordinated joint operations" proposed in P3 would also have been substantially different from the "loose cooperation" of current alliances, the ministry said.
The two main existing accords are G6, which includes Germany's Hapag-Lloyd AG and five Asian carriers, and CKYHE, which features Cosco Container Lines, the Chinese No. 1.
Maersk CEO Andersen said the partners had worked hard to address the concerns of all regulators involved, adding that Chinese shipping lines don't yet have the global route profile needed to have played a useful role in the planned alliance.
"We thought it was a good proposition and would allow us to get cost out and reduce fuel consumption," he said by phone. "There was no impact on the market side. We never saw this as consolidation and neither did the US and Europe."
Maersk has a 14.9 per cent share of the global market, based on the number of containers available in its own fleet and as chartered capacity, according to Alphaliner, which provides a daily update. MSC has 13.4 per cent and CMA CGM 8.6 per cent.
The P3 pact had initially aimed to commence operations during the current quarter, before Maersk said on May 21 that the start date had slipped to autumn amid regulatory scrutiny.
Maersk Line, the company's container unit, more than doubled its net income to $454 million in first quarter as lower costs and higher volumes countered the drop in rates.
Drewry Maritime Research analyst Neil Dekker said P3 was so large that plans for fleet deployment and a London control centre will have been well advanced, though China's ruling won't hurt Maersk Group's earnings targets, according to Andersen.
"P3 would have been nice to have but it's not a must-have," he said. "Maersk is in a very strong position. We are very competitive and making very good profits."
- Bloomberg