Removing the current subsidy for heavy emitters of greenhouse gases from the emissions trading scheme would impose "a small cost on the economy as a whole" and would be more heavily borne by the agricultural and extractive sectors, and lower income households, according to analysis by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research.
Released yesterday as an input to the ETS review by Climate Change Minister Paula Bennett, the NZIER paper says if carbon was trading at $50 a tonne -- in a so-called "high price" scenario -- it would reduce total economic growth by around 0.2 per cent a year for a 1.1 per cent reduction in gross greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
READ MORE:
• Clean energy expanding even when fossil fuels are cheap
• Solar could get New Zealand back into clean energy race
If contributions from plantation forests locking up carbon dioxide in their wood are included, net emissions would fall by 1.5 per cent under the $50 a tonne scenario. The independent economic consultancy warns its scenarios are "snapshots of before and after removing the transitional measures".
They do not project "adjustment paths" that might be agreed to phase in the removal of the current measures to make heavy GHG emitters cover the full cost of their emissions.