Judge Brian Dwyer's decision, announced on July 6, was greeted with relief and triumph by the society, and a sense of vindication.
Their members and supporters had raised $243,000 for legal costs and to employ expert witnesses. For many this was not the first time they had fought to protect the marine reserve from the long term effects of urbanisation.
History, they felt, was on their side because this was the third such decision upholding its intrinsic ecological values.
The area is a haven not only for marine life but for shore and migratory birds, some of which are endangered. But the Okura estuary is already suffering the effects of development in its wider catchment.
Sediment is likely to have contributed to the death of pipi and cockle beds earlier this year. Shellfish form the basis of the food chain on which the birds and much marine life depend.
The special nature of the area was recognised in 1995 when it was granted the protection afforded by the status of marine reserve. This was upheld by the first Environment Court decision, in 1996, when Judge David Sheppard decreed that only the land behind Long Bay, the Long Bay catchment, could be urbanised.
He moved the urban boundary to its present position and said the land above the Okura estuary, the Okura catchment, must remain rural to protect the marine reserve.
Judge Sheppard described the estuary as a "closed system" more vulnerable to the effects of sedimentation and pollution than the open shore of Long Bay beach. His decision was upheld in the Environment Court in 2003 by Judge John Bollard.
The present appeal is a blatant snub to these earlier decisions which give official recognition to the widely held feeling in the community that this area is a vital breathing space, not only for recreational activities, but in which wildlife can flourish.
The marine reserve is the central, linking feature of the North Shore's two most heavily used recreational sites – the Long Bay Regional Park on its southern shore and to the north, the Okura Bush Walkway. Both are under increasing stress as population continues to expand.
Okura Holdings' plans will do nothing to relieve the pressure for houses. Most building sites will offer spectacular views of the inner Gulf and the Whangaparaoa peninsular. Only those who can afford to will be able to live there.
Would the city benefit from the 55ha the company has pledged along the estuary foreshore as public land? Undoubtedly, but the price is too high. All options would be closed with urbanisation, for ever.
The present rural zoning allowing only 29 4ha lots with one dwelling, or mansion, per block, leaves open the possibility of future expansion of the regional park with small incremental purchases – or of legislative changes governing riparian rights and the ownership of coastal margins.
It also maintains the rural ambiance and is the best way to ensure a less polluted marine reserve.
The desire of the wider community to protect this area has been well established over nearly 30 years.
It is a pity that our cash-strapped council and its two supporting conservation societies have to spend more precious funds in yet another fight against Goliath.
• Pat Baskett is convenor of the Long Bay Okura Great Park Society.
