"It's New Zealand-based, a company and industry Fletcher knows well, with considerable potential synergies merging with its own steel businesses," Foster said.
Aside from the companies aligning on an agreed takeover price, Foster said the "key hurdle" was in gaining Commerce Commission approval. While Fletcher showed signs of being confident, Foster highlighted the recent Commerce Commission decisions which had rejected the proposals of Vodafone and Sky, NZME and Stuff and insurers Vero and Tower.
"Those highlight predicting Commerce Commission decisions is difficult," Foster said.
A merger would likely "over-step" the Commerce Commission's brightline test - that post-merger the merged entity's market share should be lower than 40 per cent - and Foster said the approval hurdle may have already risen, given the outcome of the recent decisions.
Direct support from Steel & Tube's board was necessary to achieve a full takeover, given the high proportion of smaller, retail investors, Foster said.
"Fletcher has proposed acquisition through a scheme of arrangement, which has a lower hurdle [of acceptances required] than a takeover.
"But the offer needs to be actioned by the target company," he said.
Foster said while the $1.70 offer by Fletcher was "rationally sound", for Steel & Tube the $1.70, or even slightly more, may not feel like a reasonable offer.
"Yes, the company [Steel & Tube] has ambitions for significant medium-term earnings growth, but it comes with execution risk," he said.
He also highlighted the steel sector was not an easy industry to operate within.
The industry had significant competition, volatile demand, and pricing and profit margins which could all materially impact earnings.
