Exxon boasts a market value of about $480b versus $300b for Chevron, $230b for Shell and $110b for BP.
Shell’s former chief executive, Ben van Beurden, told a Financial Times conference this week that the company — the biggest publicly listed group in the UK — was “massively undervalued” in London and may benefit from switching its listing to the US.
The FT revealed last year that Shell had considered quitting Europe and moving its listing to the US.
Oil and gas companies in the US and Canada tend to attribute a far greater portion of executive pay packets to incentives than their European counterparts.
“North American companies place a greater emphasis on pay-at-risk,” said Stephen Diotte, compensation practice leader at the Bedford Group, a Calgary-based consultancy.
“If an executive has a good year the impact of the incentive payments on total compensation can be quite significant. And that upside for pay won’t be anywhere near as high typically for a European-based executive.”
Big Tech surpasses Big Oil
The near $40m haul for Woods falls short of the pay handed out to top tech executives last year, when Microsoft chief Satya Nadella made $48.5m and Apple’s Tim Cook received $63.2m.
Oil companies across the world have reported bumper profits over the past two years as Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine drove a surge in the price of crude.
Last year was Exxon’s second-most profitable on record, with profits of $36b, only behind 2022. Woods’s base salary was worth about $1.9m, with the vast majority of his pay packet based on variable factors such as bonus and stock-based awards.
His total pay was 199 times that of the median Exxon employee and the largest since he took the helm of the oil major in 2017.
Written by: Myles McCormick in Houston
© Financial Times