This is all the more striking given that some of America’s largest retail banks have seen loan growth stall. The average loan balances at Wells Fargo, Bank of America, PNC and Truist Financial either shrank or were flat during the first quarter compared with the prior year period.
If more shoppers are embracing BNPL as an interest-free way to shop, the same cannot be said for investors and pure-play BNPL companies.
Despite rallying over the past 12 months, shares in loss-making Affirm remain down 80 per cent from their 2021 peak and are trading below their initial public offering price. Sweden’s Klarna has seen its valuation collapse from US$46b in June 2021 to US$6.7b just over 12 months later. Elsewhere, at least a dozen smaller BNPL firms have ceased operations, including Openpay and LatitudePay in Australia, ShopBack PayLater in Malaysia, Zest in India and Pace in Singapore.
Higher funding costs are one problem. Greater regulatory scrutiny is another. Critics say the continuing growth of BNPL should be seen as a sign of consumer stress and warn about “phantom debt” - BNPL loans are not reported on consumers’ credit reports so there is a risk that users could have debt that is invisible to both lenders and financial regulators.
Ultimately, it is mounting competition from big banks and payment groups that is the biggest problem for stand-alone BNPL companies. Apple, JPMorgan, Visa and Mastercard are among those that have launched BNPL services in recent years. The winners in the BNPL race are increasingly those for whom BNPL is not the primary business model.
© Financial Times