Banks will have longer to raise the capital, with the implementation period increasing from five to seven years.
READ MORE:
• Date locked in for controversial bank capital decision
• Jenny Ruth: The elephant in RBNZ's bank capital room
• Premium - Bank boss' warning: 'Capital is going to get scarcer'
• Bank capital changes will cost economy, ASB warns
Smaller banks - which mean all but the big four Australian banks - will need to hold total capital of 16 per cent, less than proposed in December, a reflection of the "smaller mess" which would be caused in the event that they collapsed, Orr said.
The biggest concession came as the Reserve Bank broadened what it would consider as tier-one capital, to include redeemable preference shares, a type of equity which investors tend to view more like a debt instrument. These shares offer a cheaper way for the banks to raise money.
Orr said close to half of the additional $20b could come from the new vehicles, which could provide a fillip for the local capital markets as the New Zealand subsidiaries could raise at least some of the funds domestically.
While the Reserve Bank said it expected some of the funds would be raised offshore, Orr said the investment community suggested the New Zealand market could absorb the entire amount.
The New Zealand dollar rose on the news, as did bank shares, with the changes meaning the capital requirements would be less expensive for the banks to cope with.
But arguments immediately resumed over the impact of the changes. The Reserve Bank's own analysis was that the higher levels would boost the economy, adding only around 20 basis points to borrowing costs.
ANZ meanwhile said that while the proposals could add 30-60 points to borrowing costs, with the impact "uneven" and the risk of a particular impact on sectors such as agriculture and business.
ANZ chief economist Sharon Zollner said that with interest rates so low, if the impacts were greater than the central bank expected it would increase the odds the Reserve Bank would have to turn to unconventional monetary policy.
"This would especially be the case if the economy was hit by any kind of negative shock over the transition period."
While the Reserve Bank has repeatedly insisted the changes will have no relative impact on any particular sectors, analysts have warned sectors which are seen as more risky will find it even harder to borrow.
Federated Farmers commerce spokesman Andrew Hoggard said the impact of the changes was likely to be "much higher" on banks than borrowers as a whole, calling on the banks to absorb as much of the costs as possible.
"There is less lending competition in the agricultural sector and we know banks are already looking to reduce their exposure to farm debt."