Alitalia is the latest brand in recent months to release products or ads that have been criticised as racist. Earlier this year, Gucci, another Italian brand, stopped selling a black-knit women's sweater that could be pulled up over the lower half of a wearer's face. Its opening for a mouth was surrounded by bright red lips, and the garment was decried on social media for evoking blackface imagery. Prada, also based in Italy, apologised for charms on bags that resembled black monkeys with outsize red lips. Last year, H&M, based in Sweden, apologised for an image in its online store of a black child model wearing a hooded sweatshirt that said "coolest monkey in the jungle."
The issues are not just limited to international brands.
This week, Nike canceled the release of a sneaker that featured a 13-star American flag, which is associated with the Revolutionary War and considered by some to be a symbol of oppression and racism. Colin Kaepernick, the former National Football League quarterback and social justice activist, reportedly criticized the design to Nike privately, expressing concern to the company that the Betsy Ross flag had been co-opted by groups that espouse racist ideologies.
Brands have become quick to respond to these crises, which inevitably raise questions around who is making the editorial decisions behind these ads and products. The ad industry has long struggled with a lack of gender and ethnic diversity.
Written by: Sapna Maheshwari
© 2019 THE NEW YORK TIMES