There's no way to organically increase the EU's population so as to get an extra 42 million people by 2020, let alone 257 million by 2060: You can't force people to make more babies. Increased immigration is therefore Europe's only salvation from an approaching fiscal disaster. Europe needed that Syrian boy, just as it needs, and should cherish, everyone taking a leaky boat to Lampedusa, or a rusty minibus to Berlin, Lisbon or Madrid. These are almost exclusively young people, sometimes unaccompanied children, who if integrated will pay for — and care for — Europe's retirees.
Economic activity rates are sometimes lower among Europe's immigrant populations than among local-born ones. For example, in France, 78 per cent of the locally-born working-age people and only 68.7 per cent of residents born outside the EU have jobs or are self-employed. Activity rates depend on lots of factors, ranging from the difficulty of learning the local language, to the restrictiveness of labour laws and the xenophobia of employers. In Italy, 72 per cent of non-EU immigrants and just 67.1 per cent of locals are money-earners. For Europe as a whole, all of these influences even out and activity rates are almost the same for those born locally and for non-EU immigrants, at 76.6 per cent and 73.5 per cent.
People who have the drive and street smarts to travel halfway around the world, with little money and small children in their arms, are going to grab every chance they are given to improve their lot. Countries that lag in productivity should welcome the increased competition in their labour markets, even if that makes some locals unhappy.
Anti-immigrant sentiment is especially high in eastern European countries. At the same time, some of these are in the gravest danger from ageing. Slovakia's ratio of senior citizens to the general population, for example, is now just 13.9 per cent, one of the lowest in the EU; that's projected to rise to 31 per cent by 2050. Hungary's social system will also struggle to cope, as the proportion of retirees in the population rises from 17.9 per cent to 27.5 per cent. In these countries, which have seen very little immigration until now, irrational xenophobia helps irresponsible politicians win popularity points. The children of today's voters, however, are likely to face higher taxes and decreased pension benefits if these countries manage to keep immigrants out.
Until Europe agrees on a common approach to the increased influx of immigrants, countries with the smartest governments, Germany in particular, will pick up most of the newcomers, acquiring better insurance against future problems.
The appalling image of 3-year-old Aylan Kurdi on that Turkish beach may help to shift public opinion. More than 170,000 British citizens have signed a recent online petition for their government to take in more immigrants, enough to force a parliamentary debate. More than 15,000 Icelanders have signed a letter urging their government to open the gates wider, because "refugees are our future spouses, best friends, or soulmates, the drummer for the band of our children, our next colleague, Miss Iceland in 2022, the carpenter who finally finished the bathroom, the cook in the cafeteria, the fireman, the computer genius, or the television host". German and Hungarian volunteers have brought toys to Syrian kids and shown them cartoons.
These people may not realise that their compassion makes good economic sense, but it does. Xenophobia doesn't.
• Leonid Bershidsky, a Bloomberg View contributor, is a Berlin-based writer.