Speaking to BusinessDesk, AIA's chief financial officer Phil Neutze said the airport was heartened by the extent to which the commission had accepted that its risk profile would change with additional investment, and that there were "a lot of areas of analysis that we can bolster, particularly as the commission has been good at setting out what they require".
"We believe we can provide a lot to give more comfort."
Neutze could not comment on the potential for the commission to eventually agree a higher rate than its target returns mid-point, but lower than what AIA is currently seeking.
"There may be legitimate reasons for Auckland Airport to target higher returns than our benchmark," said Begg. "However, based on the information they have provided to date, we are yet to be satisfied that they will be acting in the long-term interest of consumers and limited in their ability to earn excessive profits."
Submissions on the draft report are sought by May 25, with a final decision to be published in September.
AIA is New Zealand's second-largest listed company by market capitalisation, at $7.41 billion based on this morning's opening share price of $6.16, although that price has slid 9.7 percent in the last year and has fallen 19 cents in the last 11 days.
In a March 9 letter to the commission, the airport's head of economic regulation and pricing, Adrienne Darling, said the company's "decision on the appropriate target return ... was informed by our understanding of the systematic risk Auckland Airport that would flow from the major step-change in our capital expenditure programme relative to historic levels".
In a statement to the NZX this morning, Neutze said the commission's report "broadly supports" the airport's pricing decision as it recognises it is "investing heavily in new infrastructure in response to growth and that planned and actual investment is occurring at an appropriate time".
The commission was seeking further justification of the pricing decisions that had flowed from that investment programme, noting that the commission had previously said it expected regulated airports to "consider their own airport specific factors when determining their target return". In real terms, airport charging would reduce by 1.7 percent over the next five years for international passengers and increase by 0.8 percent for domestic passengers, with a $1.19 per passenger runway landing charge also signalled from 2021 to help fund the second runway.
Begg said the commission did "not have significant concerns about these redevelopments and recognise that strong passenger growth is putting pressure on their facilities and expenditure".