Councillors were told the current policy provided no flexibility for freeholding specific, non-strategic assets which could assist in the redevelopment of industrial or commercial land in Napier, and stimulate private investment, if sold.
More flexibility would allow the council to consider each property on its merits so any decisions would be made "with the best intentions for the future of Napier".
So one of the possible policy amendments on which council agreed to be consulted was to allow the freeholding of some "non-strategic" land, on a case-by-case basis, and only when alternative and suitable investments could be found.
"The decision to sell any property would need to be made on the basis that an alternative investment could be found with similar and/or improved returns so the financial implications for ratepayers is negligible."
Funds from leasehold land are required by law be directed to the improvement, protection, management, or use of the inner harbour and the coastal marine area.
Given the financial returns to council, councillor Graeme Taylor said he was glad there were "lots of safeguards in place", and that taking each property on a case-by-case basis was the right approach.
Council director city strategy Richard Munneke said council's motivation "needs to be to protect the ratepayer".
He said the "public good" would also be protected because any proposal would go through the council's audit and risk committee before being accepted.
Councillors were told there was a small amount of risk if they chose not to propose a change to the policy, because this would disappoint those leaseholders wishing to freehold their site.
There was also risk in changing the existing "no sell" policy - council could get multiple requests from leaseholders to sell properties, raising challenges to find equal investment opportunities so as to avoid an impact on rates.
The "non-strategic" land was identified in a June 2016 report commissioned by the council as having no particular public space, urban or landscape attributes. The majority of these properties were in the Onekawa industrial area.