The Tesla Model 3 costs over US$39,000 new ($53,830). Its emissions are very low, even if you include a weighting for hydrocarbons used to make electricity, as consultancy Carbon Footprint does. Drivers generate less than a tonne of CO2 for driving 10,000 miles. That is a midpoint between the average annual mileages of US and UK motorists. The carbon burden for the old Volkswagen Passat, a comparable petrol car costing about US$24,000 ($33,123) is a whacking 6.5 tonnes.
You can shave off almost half of that carbon with a traditional hybrid. Even more with a plug-in hybrid recharged with mains electricity. The average carbon burden is about 1.1 tonnes for 10,000 miles, according to Carbon Footprint.
Yet Professor David Bailey of Birmingham university is sceptical about hybrids: "Why haul around an engine you mostly do not use?" One reason might be the lower cost of a smaller battery.
However, UBS reckons the price premium for electric vehicles over petrol cars will disappear by 2024. The bank expects better manufacturing to cut the cost of batteries to the magic figure of US$100 per kilowatt hour.
There are two main conclusions. First, if you are better off, deeply green and can recharge at home, you might as well go electric now. Carbon Footprint's John Buckley, who is installing solar panels to charge his Tesla, "cannot recommend this enough".
Second, if you are on a tighter budget, prefer to lag behind mainstream trends and live in an apartment, you may want to pause before shifting from petrol to electric.
By avoiding a hybrid stepping stone, you may be able to save both money and CO2.
- Lex is a premium daily commentary service from the Financial Times.
© Financial Times