The unintended beneficiaries of these projects, such as property owners located close to a new train station, receive a substantial unearned and untaxed financial windfall which is effectively subsidised by the public.
If this funding was "captured", it could repay loans or infrastructure bonds that have been used to fund the project.
The principle that beneficiaries, such as property owners and developers, contribute an equitable share of the value they receive from a public investment is an important attribute of value capture methods.
In their most direct applications, value capture methods do not increase tax rates, although they are frequently combined with market value base user charges.
This allows policy makers to balance funding sources between unintended direct and indirect beneficiaries on the one hand, and the other stakeholders and users serviced by the investment on the other.
Value capture programmes have been widely used in North America for decades, and are now being adopted in the UK and Australia. In London, the $29.6 billion Crossrail project is utilising a 2 per cent business rate supplement (BRS) on large commercial properties to finance $7.6 billion or 26 per cent of the overall project cost.
Another successful application is the redevelopment of Denver Union Station in the US state of Colorado. This integrated urban renewal project transformed an abandoned passenger train station into a vibrant urban precinct on the edge of the central business district (CBD).
Increases in property tax revenues and profits from land sales captured within the 16 hectare precinct contributed around 35 per cent of the project's US$550 million cost.
Value Capture conceptual model
In August, the Productivity Commission released a draft report examining New Zealand's existing urban planning system and what it could look like in the future.
The Better Urban Planning Draft Report provides the framework for a public debate around Value Capture. Given Value Capture funding methods present a fair, equitable and efficient option to help pay for critical infrastructure, the draft report recommends that new value capture mechanisms should be considered. Value capture methods such as the sale of development rights, hypothecating incremental tax revenues and introducing more effective land tax measures will compensate the council and central government for infrastructure provision that cannot be met by existing measures.
Well-conceived and implemented public projects can increase land values by up to 50 per cent. The extent of the uplift depends on a number of factors; the nature of the infrastructure, the proximity of the property in question, accessibility and urban design amenities. As Auckland continues to invest in some of its most significant projects of the next two decades, it will also be delivering a financial windfall to property owners and speculators under current funding mechanisms.
That just doesn't make sense when there is a tried and tested way of leveraging this value to reduce the overall cost to all taxpayers. Embracing Value Capture, as part of a range of innovative financing mechanisms, will enable Auckland to continue to deliver the necessary infrastructure that will make living, working and doing business easier.
Joe Langley is a Technical Director, Infrastructure Advisory for AECOM and is based in Sydney.