Rod Sims is not mad, just "disappointed".
A year after slugging Nurofen with a A$6 million ($6.5m) fine for misleading claims about targeted pain relief, the head of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is taking aim at the makers of Voltaren for exactly the same issue.
The ACCC has instituted proceedings in the Federal Court against GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, alleging the drugmakers misled consumers in the marketing of Voltaren Emulgel and Osteo Gel pain relief products.
Osteo Gel is marketed as being formulated for treating osteoarthritis conditions — but as in the Nurofen case, both products contain the same active ingredient, diclofenac diethylammonium gel 11.6mg/g.
While the recommended retail price of Osteo Gel 150 is A$3 more expensive than Emulgel 150g at A$28.99 compared with A$25.99, the ACCC said the former was found in-store at a mark-up of up to A$7.50, or 33 per cent.