Males between the age of 18 and 20 were about nine times more likely to find ads by the top 25 brands than the remaining 300-plus alcohol labels, according to the study. Females in the same age group were five times more likely.
"It is striking that the popular brands are so much more likely to have most heavily exposed 18-20 years than the less popular brands among young people," David Jernigan, one of the study's authors, said in an interview.
"Spending all this money to advertise your product to a group that can't yet purchase your product seems odd."
Read also:
• Liquor putting tots in hospital
• Alcohol sponsorship: Doctors want to cut flow of liquor money in Kiwi sport
That is, unless those brands are subtly working to ensure their alcoholic hegemony.
"Indoctrination? To use a word like that I would have to be able to prove intent, which I can't right now," Jernigan said. "But the association is definitely supportive of our hypothesis that the advertising is playing a role."
Alcohol advertising is largely self-regulated in the US, meaning that the alcohol industry sets its own voluntary barriers. Those include minimising their exposure to underage drinkers. Alcohol advertisements, for instance, should be used only in magazines where less than 30 per cent of the readers are underage.
But given the outcome of this study, and the overwhelming popularity of the top alcohol brands among America's underage drinkers - the top 25 brands account for nearly 50 per cent of all underage binge drinking episodes - it appears that self-regulation likely won't suffice.
- Washington Post