When Uber decided to name Expedia's Dara Khosrowshahi as the new leader of the troubled ride-hailing firm, one phrase was used repeatedly to describe him: a "dark horse."
On Sunday, following the unusually public and acrimonious search to find a replacement for Uber co-founder Travis Kalanick - with big shareholders suing the former CEO and tweets from sitting CEOs withdrawing from consideration - the company picked Khosrowshahi for the job. (He was not officially named until Tuesday.) After the consideration of high-wattage names like General Electric chairman Jeff Immelt and Hewlett Packard Enterprise chief executive Meg Whitman - who were seen as either a front-runner or backed by segments of the board - the naming of Khosrowshahi to the job was called "surprising," "unexpected" - even "shocking."
But as horse races go, being the unforeseen winner - and a lower-profile one at that - has its advantages. Leadership experts say Khosrowshahi's lesser-known status means he'll be given more slack from the media and investors, be seen as more accessible to employees, and have the ability to make the kind of radical changes that may be needed to manage the much-needed transformation of the fast-growing startup's troubled culture.
There has not been much research on how "surprise" candidates for CEO jobs tend to perform over more well-known or expected choices, says Jason Schloetzer, a professor at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business who studies CEO succession.
The boardroom mentality of seeking out a superstar CEO - described well in the 2004 book "Searching for a Corporate Savior" -- has given way to more focus on internal succession planning and less credibility to the idea that executive experience running one big company necessarily translates well across firms.