It's common to read headlines and articles on the devastation caused by climate change but too often articles proceed to advocate yet more action to reduce emissions - as if that was going to help.
I suggest that a better way to go is to acknowledge first of all that the climate is always changing and that it is powered by powerful forces which humans cannot control.
We should spend our money first of all on sensible planning decisions and secondly adapting to climate change as and when it occurs.
Apply common sense. In Australia, a lack of common sense over energy supply has led to Australians now facing massive increases in power bills. You reap what the politicians sow.
Denis M
Yet again, it looks like business and the public, will lead the way in our climate change responses. Where local government (and national government) could be taking more stringent action, such as making proper surveys of their areas and refusing building permits on land susceptible to flooding, it is left to private business to simply refuse to insure buildings on flood-prone land.
Similarly, on a worldwide scenario, it is largely left to public companies to simply move away from hydrocarbon power etc, and for the public to stop their involvement (buying shares) in these companies.
For any person to persist in living in a flood-prone zone is hard to understand. The financial cost of getting reasonable value for your property is something that we need to discuss openly in our politics.
Alexander M
In reply to Alexander M: Yet when local and regional government attempt to change land-use regulations to prevent building in coastal hazard zones, the howls of protest echo from one end of the motu to the other.
It's the NIMBY syndrome in full flight. I have seen it here in Christchurch over the past 30 years with people trying to prevent the Christchurch City Council from entering natural hazard information on their property LIMS, even after the earthquakes.
We have a whole community built on a sandspit that moves. We know that the spit tip has moved more than 100m laterally during a 125-year period. That's just the range of movement, not the total movement because the spit tends to move back and forth. We have areas in the city that repeatedly flood during heavy rain events, especially during low tide. The area of inundation increased after the quakes, especially because the river beds were uplifted during the quakes.
Paul H
Owners or buyers risk - most information is on file, factor in storm surges from cyclones. A story from my grandmother: In 1936 at Pukehina in the Bay of Plenty, a storm surge was going over the sand dunes and into the estuary - it is now fully developed with housing.
David M
How many beach fronts do you think are going to get covered in sea water? Very few.
Ian U
The Rotorua Daily Post welcomes letters from readers. Please note the following:
• Letters should not exceed 200 words.
• They should be opinion based on facts or current events.
• If possible, please email.
• No noms-de-plume.
• Letters will be published with names and suburb/city.
• Please include full name, address and contact details for our records only.
• Local letter writers given preference.
• Rejected letters are not normally acknowledged.
• Letters may be edited, abridged, or rejected at the Editor's discretion.
• The Editor's decision on publication is final. No correspondence will be entered into.
Email editor@dailypost.co.nz
