Ms Ryder said her position was the reef retained its outstanding natural character status, although there were gaps in the information for the condition of the entire reef.
"The adverse effects on the pre-Rena level of natural character, on the part of the reef where the wreck and debris remain, are significant but when considering the entire context of the reef, are not significant."
Ms Ryder agreed that removal of the bow section of the ship would improve the reef's natural character.
Meanwhile, the safety of the Rena wreck as a dive site was assessed by a man with more than 6000 dives under his belt.
Simon Mitchell has dived shipwrecks all around New Zealand and the world for the past 42 years and has been involved in the Rena case as an expert on the safety of diving in and around shipwrecks on behalf of the applicants.
Dr Mitchell came to Monday's hearings four hours after his most recent dive of the Rena.
He advocated for the Rena to remain on the reef.
"In my opinion, the hazard represented by the residual wreckage is extremely small.
"Concerns raised about the safety of diving on the shallow wreckage are framed largely around compilation of an inventory of hypothetical hazards such as trauma on sharp edges, trauma from wave effects around hard projections, entanglement in cables and adverse events whilst trying to perform tasks like retrieving artefacts.
"Notably, however, there is a conspicuous lack of evidence which defines the level of risk these hazards truly represent."
Dr Mitchell said it was possible over time that afew divers would be injured around the wreck and there could be fatal accidents.
"But extensive experience tells us the risk is very small and probably indistinguishable from the background risk of diving."