Council acting chief executive Craig Tiriana had what is in my opinion the cheek to say the questions in the annual Community Satisfaction Survey have been "refined for current purposes" (News, July 14).
Whose current purposes? Won't this fiddling with questions prevent year-on-year comparisons?
Tiriana also said the report will be released at the "appropriate time" after "working on issues highlighted in the report". Who says what is appropriate timing and what issues need attention?
No wonder the council only had 19 submissions on the spatial plan that is meant to reach out to 2050. There is absolutely no chance that they will be around that long - especially when the RDRR's Alternative Spatial Plan calls for balanced attention to people, profit, planet and progress towards sustainable prosperity.
The last thing we need right now is fake news about how brilliantly council is performing.
(Abridged)