In my opinion this is a model hospital filled with a great team of professionals. All of Rotorua can be very proud of this world class establishment. Stand up Rotorua and say thanks to all the staff and may they have a quiet and peaceful Christmas.
BL DUNCAN
Rotorua
Pool performance not clear
The Aquatic Centre is a great facility for Rotorua and not many cities in New Zealand, if any, can boast a 50m heated outdoor pool that is swimmable all year round. As a user, I find the staff great and there is always a lifeguard around each pool, which is necessary given the large number of young (and older swimmers) in the pools.
The 2014/15 Annual Report for the Rotorua District Council gives an income figure for the Aquatic Centre of $3,358,000 versus expenditure of $3,302,000 meaning in that year it made a small profit of $56,000. Unfortunately since the new mayor has been in office, the Annual Reports do not provide the details for the different cost centres that the council manages and whether this is deliberate so that ratepayers can not see what is happening does make you wonder.
So, does the contracting out of services at the Aquatic Centre mean this facility has started to make a loss over the past couple of years through poor management compared to previous years or did someone on council just have a brilliant (i.e. stupid) idea? Interesting to note that the council states it has been losing revenue due to the museum's closure but in fact the museum had been operating at a loss for quite a while, losing $193,000 in the 2014/15 year.
PAUL CARPENTER
Rotorua
Holiday rental decisions
It is to council's credit that it has turned the policy muddle I described (Letters, September 6) around with the Plan Change 6 – Holiday Rentals consultation process.
It has untangled private residents offering bed and breakfast (with the owner or manager present), and holiday rental accommodation (with the owner or manager not present), from commercial operators who offer tourist accommodation and private residents who fail to comply with the conditions for holiday rental accommodation. It has proposed reasonable performance standards for 'permitted activities'.
The 100-day boundary between rating for residential and commercial purposes, however, seems to be somewhat arbitrary given that commercial operators must meet significant compliance costs that private providers do not. Further, Rotorua faces acute challenges over rental affordability and growing shortages of tourism workers.
Rotorua's main competitor in tourism, Queenstown, faces similar dilemmas. It took these and many other many variables into account when it recently set a boundary of 28 days per year for private rentals in outer residential areas, and 90 days in central areas. Both Rotorua and Queenstown may be missing the IRD's threshold of 60 days pa for allowing business-related expenses which gives all hosts and operators the same taxation conditions for planning the development of their businesses.
More generally, we need to slow or reverse the trend towards short-term rentals, free up more houses for the long-term rental market, and simultaneously, encourage the development of tourism businesses.
The deadline for submissions is 12 January 2018. Happy Christmas.
REYNOLD MACPHERSON
Rotorua