In the world of urban design the argument for taxing cyclists as proposed by Alf Hoyle (Letters, May 23) is a well-worn chestnut that periodically arises, revealing what is in my view a general ignorance about the well-proven benefits of cycling.
Regular cycling has been unequivocally proven internationally to significantly improve people's mental and physical health, productivity, and almost any other measure of social and personal health you can think of.
It is the overwhelming evidence of such benefits that has led the central government to subsidise and encourage councils nationwide to encourage more, safer cycling via new cycleways such as that we are seeing in Rotorua.
Alf should also remember that most of the roading budget comes not from fuel tax but from income tax and GST, and therefore it could be argued that regular cyclists should deserve a tax break to reflect the positives they bring to a community at negligible cost.
This will never happen of course, but it serves to highlight that if Alf is truly seeking "fairness" he should be careful what he wishes for.