Letters: Loss of trout fishing could cost Rotorua

Proposed changes to trout regulations could have a major impact on Rotorua, a reader says. Photo/File.

As many concerned trout fisherman will be aware, the Green Party's proposal to significantly change trout fishing as we know it today could potentially cost Rotorua in more ways than one.

Basically, the Green Party in conjunction with DOC is proposing with their Amendment to the Conservation Act to not only be able to close down complete hatcheries like ours, allow trout farming, allow trout to be sold, and include trout and salmon's future to be included in Treaty negotiations.

Their questionable rationale for this draconian recommendation is that in our lakes, for example, trout, and trout alone, are the sole reason for the decline in the six native freshwater species. One could argue that sure, trout have been a predator over the years, but certainly not the one and only reason for such a decline. Human activity is the prime reason, including agricultural land use, the general decline in water quality, Māori cultural harvesting, and of late the curse of the catfish.

Given that there have been no evidence-based figures to quantify the cost of such a significant change to our Rotorua catchment, one can only estimate the economic benefit today of trout fishing at around $60-80 million per anum. Closer to home, we have the figure of $90m quoted by DOC in 2010 for the Taupō catchment.

Hence the figure for Rotorua, some nine years later is, I believe, realistic. Accordingly, if the Greens, and any other party which may be brave enough to proceed with this knee- jerk reaction, then the cost to them, and the tourist dollar for Rotorua will be significant.

Mike Mcvicker
Rotorua

Council priorities

If you ask me all the councillors need their heads banged together, they're asking for more money now when they have just received $20-odd million for the lakefront - so what chance have they got of getting it?

They are meant to be business people but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that the museum is far more important than the lakefront and will show an immediate financial return on completion.

So why doesn't the council fix up the lakefront as it is and divert the rest of the money into the museum and get the ball rolling, or is that too simple?

This is fast moving into an election-year issue, a bit of common sense would go a long, long way.

Gavin Muir
Rotorua

The Rotorua Daily Post welcomes letters from readers. Please note the following:
• Letters should not exceed 250 words.
• They should be opinion based on facts or current events.
• If possible, please email.
• No noms-de-plume.
• Letters will be published with names and suburb/city.
• Please include full name, address and contact details for our records only.
• Local letter writers given preference.
• Rejected letters are not normally acknowledged.
• Letters may be edited, abridged, or rejected at the Editor's discretion.
• The Editor's decision on publication is final.
Email editor@dailypost.co.nz