A desirable legacy?
Like many others, I object to over $40 million being spent on the Lakefront upgrade but agree with the mayor when she says that "This was the biggest announcement that this council will have as a legacy into the future" (News, October 5). But a legacy of significant and growing debt should not be bragged about.
The deputy mayor commented that consultation was also on the level of spending people were happy with so I now think he or council should be upfront and tell us who these people or groups were that thought $40 million of ratepayers' and taxpayers' money was okay.
Maybe I'm being cynical but I can't help but think it was big business not ratepayers who were consulted.
And when I look at the plan I see sterility, parking spaces gone, the playground gone, trees gone so no shade for picnicking, no path by the water's edge and Memorial Dr gone.