Yes, John Pakes is right (Letters, November 8), Rotorua did score a Fitch rating of AA-, but press releases should not always be taken as gospel. Had he investigated this further, he would have discovered that the analysis also included "... amid debt metrics that remain weaker than the average AA- peers". (Reuters, March 31).
He is obviously also unaware that AA- was the lowest rating given, an ignominious position Rotorua shared with one other town in New Zealand rated by Fitch.
Another interesting piece of information. Most towns and cities in New Zealand use the global financial research company Standard and Poors, possibly to get more comprehensive comparisons with similar sized towns, but in some cases maybe, this would be a bad thing.
One of the reasons this type of rating is requested by councils is to justify and enable debt increase. That begs the question. How is this increased debt going to be repaid if debt levels continue to rise?
From one whose job included regular statistical analysis and reporting, statistics are very interesting and even fun because they are very malleable.
The recipient of these data can interpret them in any way with reporting or summarising often dependent on the desired outcome and how they are spun. It's easy to blow one's own trumpet by releasing and describing only the positive data. The converse is also equally possible.
What we really need is unexpurgated data from which we can draw our own conclusions.
PADDI HODGKISS
Rotorua
I feel I should respond again to John Pakes, this time about his 'fine rating' of our council. He talks about 'transparent reporting and financial disclosures'.
What a laugh! The other day, when council was obliged to disclose how much they had spent on a legal defence of the CE, it took a LGOIMA request to prise the number of $63,487.48 out of them.
Then Mr Pakes talks about 'predictable revenue'. Well, we don't need a professional accountant for that. Anyone can tell you that next week the overdraft of $169 million will be higher again. Nothing to be proud of.
Of course the council now partly blames the closure of the museum and SHMPAC for that, hoping that we will forget that the debt was already $174m before the earthquake struck. That's what I call a shocking disclosure.
HARRY BRASSER
Rotorua