While sympathetic to the mayor's recent message (Letters, January 6) asking for positivity, I note an inappropriate degree of negativity within her letter when she wrote 'the majority of people who call Rotorua home aspire for our district to flourish'. This implies there is a minority that doesn't want Rotorua to flourish. Is this true?
The mayor also wrote that 'it is imperative .... to turn our backs on negative energy'. It is very easy to fall into the trap of 'think the way I think' and you are positive with positive energy, but think differently and you are negative. A truly positive attitude, though, would be to claim that all people who call Rotorua home want the district to flourish. At the same time, one should recognise that 'flourish' does not mean the same thing to everybody. For some, 'flourish' may mean a population doubling, others may regard the environmental impacts of such an outcome a disaster.
Good leadership recognises this fact and does not label as positive or negative differing viewpoints but values diversity, seeks to promote understanding, and ensures proper analysis of claimed good ideas. That way, with time, we reach consensus around the important things for Rotorua's future.
Energy is energy, neither positive nor negative. Great leadership involves harnessing and utilising it, wherever found, to achieve better outcomes for all. Can we hope that in 2017 this, rather than a labelling of positive or negative energy, become the Rotorua Way.
KATHY HORGAN
Rotorua