I was shocked to read that, based on the McGuinness Institute report, the mayor would like to see the responsibility for distribution of some of the scarce central Government funding for health, welfare, education, employment and policing passed over to a group so that it could "develop its own ways of moving forward". (Rotorua Daily Post, February 4).
Yes, as she says, it would be a radical change. Equally radical and alarming that someone should suggest a programme based around "demarcation zones". This expression conjures up thoughts of isolation of the many falling outside the demarcation zones, divisions, corruption and bribery. Most of us know what this type of policy has done in other countries.
The report suggests that experimental zones should be trialled in isolated communities, of which Rotorua could be one.
There is little enough Government funding for social services, so it's worrying that it could be wasted on a trial, and trials can fail, thereby failing those in our community for whom it is intended. And, at the end of the day, who is ultimately accountable?
Developing "its own ways of moving forward" suggests an enormous amount of talking, multitudes of meetings, and duplication of work already performed at central-Government level. Funding should be spent at the coalface.