Editorial: Referendum no way to decide on fluoride

FILE

Referendums are great for testing the mood of the electorate on issues of consequence.

But unless it's a triennial election they shouldn't be used in binding form to make major policy decisions.

Sadly, this could become a possibility in Rotorua, with the city's district councillors due to discuss today options for public consultation on putting fluoride in our water.

A report from council staff recommends a binding referendum to decide the issue.

But if our councillors - with their access to expert advice and strong community links - are not there to make important decisions on our behalf, what did we vote them in for?

If they were to hand the decision over to the public are they not abrogating their responsibility?

Referendums have the potential to become toys for the politically motivated.

Many people are happy for their elected representatives to make policy decisions and won't be as motivated to vote in a referendum as those who have a barrow to push.

And since when is a health matter an issue that should be decided by Joe and Jo Public?

The Ministry of Health and the Lakes District Health Board have shown clear support for fluoride.

Clearly this is not endorsement enough.

I do have faith the majority of Rotorua voters would make the right decision, but there's no need to go to the effort and expense required to come to the same decision councillors should be able to make themselves.