But Health Minister Jonathan Coleman cites Pharmac research findings that, of 22 cancer medicines funded in Australia but not NZ, only one clearly exceeded international thresholds for clinically meaningful gains and that drug was being considered by Pharmac.
It indicates the country is not missing opportunities to consider potentially useful treatments and is avoiding significant expenditure on cancer medicines that are either unable to provide a supporting evidence base, are potentially harmful versus standard care, or offer low health gain, he says.
He also points to the fact that the Government had spent nearly $63 million since 2008 on its faster cancer treatment programme.
It is a sound argument given the cost of the treatments. Cancer has a devastating impact on families and most people have been touched by it in some way.
In an ideal world these treatments would be funded and there would be no need for people to have to put out public appeals to help fund their treatments. However, the money has to come from somewhere.
The Government needs to be judicious about how it uses taxpayer funds and has to ensure that the money it does spend has the biggest impact.