I have read with increasing frustration the paranoia around the supposed undemocratic and unconstitutional demands of Te Arawa.
Te Arawa never said in the current process that they wanted to bypass democracy and constitutional rights. They understand that in the current system only duly elected members can make the final decision and, at best, they can only give advice and make recommendations. What Te Arawa are trying to offer to the Rotorua District Council is an effective helping hand and not a move to seize control.
The Te Arawa standing committee model established in 1993 in effect is being reviewed. That involves considering new systems, structures and capabilities that enable more robust discussions, advice and decisions to be made in a spirit of partnership and mutual respect. The council will decide whether they want this or not and have already stated that they intend to take this to the wider community for comment.
Merepeka Raukawa-Tait mentioned in a previous article that Te Arawa doesn't need the council but the council needs Te Arawa. I agree. Just take a look at the significant council debt, the stagnant economy and the disproportionate social pathologies.
Te Arawa is a pathway to a plausible solution. The largest landowners and ratepayers, the largest landlords, equity owners in geothermal energy, forestry, farming and tourism, co-managers of the lakes and owners of the lake beds and recipients of significant Treaty settlement funds. Demographers have also indicated that Maori youth will make up a significant proportion of Rotorua's population within the next 20 years.