I should make it clear that my gripe is not with those I spoke to, who were, on the whole, courteous and helpful.
My inquiry was simple enough. I wanted to know what the $308.74 represented and how it had been incurred - we had, in fact, terminated our contract with the company some months earlier. It took several hours of increasing frustration on my part before we reached an agreement that they would email me with details of how the supposed debt of $308.74 had arisen.
When the email duly arrived, however, it did no more than state that the $308.74 was owing. To cut this long story short, I was then able to check my bank account and to show that I had paid, at the time of closing the account with the company in November, a sum of over $300 which had then been outstanding.
My attempt to communicate this information by email to the "customer service department" was met with the response that I had emailed a "no-reply" address. In the email, I had mentioned my legal qualifications, said that if the matter was not resolved satisfactorily "forthwith", I would "pursue my own remedies" for what seemed to be attempted extortion and harassment, and recommended that they show the correspondence "to their superiors".
The email, whether received or not, seems to have been read. I was then telephoned with an assurance that the outstanding amount had been "waived" and our account had been closed. So ended a morning of unalloyed frustration, wasted nervous energy and emotional exhaustion. I had not only wasted a whole morning but had also suffered a most unpleasant experience.
My reason for reporting this unhappy episode is that, as my wife and I reflected, we are both of advanced years, and ill-equipped to deal with such unfamiliar issues. As it happens, my legal background and occasional experience of dealing with stroppy people meant that I was able to withstand the attempt to bully us into paying a large sum that we did not owe.
Other elderly people may not have had my defences available. And, as the management of their affairs - and particularly financial affairs - becomes increasingly something done online, they are unlikely to have the technical skills needed to do so. And that is to say nothing of the scammers whose efforts to con people out of their savings have recently been highlighted.
There is, as far as I know, no ombudsman or industry watchdog available to consumers when they run into the kind of issue that faced us. Large companies may calculate that such tactics will pay off in the end. I urge customers, particularly elderly ones, to stand up for themselves.