That suggestion was knocked back by councillors at the time. Before the final rates discussion took place last Friday, Mayor Andrew King declared a conflict of interest and withdrew from the council chambers.
"To clarify in respect of the decision to move to capital value or not, I do not believe I have a closed mind on this topic, however what is clear is that due to the portfolio of properties I own or influence, or I have interest in I have a pecuniary interest to relation to any decision in respect of the move to capital value," Mayor King said.
"This interest is greater than the public's in general. Due to this conflict of interest I am going to vacate the chair now and leave the meeting."
Deputy Mayor Martin Gallagher took over the meeting.
After a series of amendments, heated debate and a bit of confusion, the council settled on the 9.7 per cent rise in one year, however some councillors were still unhappy.
After Mayor King returned to the meeting , councillor Angela O'Leary took aim at him.
"I made a plan with our residents in 2015 and that plan was agreed with them — that they could rely on us to keep rates at 3.8 per cent for the next 10 years and that meant something to me," Cr O'Leary said.
Councillor James Casson said he preferred the 3.8 per cent option and that the new rates rise is not perfect, but that they may as well get it done quickly.
Councillor Rob Pascoe said he favoured a short and sharp rise.
"I think the 9.7 is a compromise of sorts. I think delaying the increase over two years is fraught with a number of risks."
He said the property revaluation due at the end of 2018 would be one of those problems.
Councillors Paula Southgate, Siggi Henry and O'Leary voted against the rates increase.
Mayor King, Deputy Mayor Gallagher and councillors Ryan Hamilton, Leo Tooman, Dave Macpherson, Garry Mallett, Geoff Taylor, Mark Bunting, Pascoe and Casson voted in favour.