Happier times: The new council after being sworn in last year. Photo / File
COMMENT
It's just so embarrassing.
A special meeting about the behaviour of Tauranga's elected members. A Crown team to review and monitor the council at who knows what cost. A mayor accused of being agro, councillors accused of plotting against him, humiliating texts, secretly recorded meetings.
How did one ofNew Zealand's fastest-growing cities get here?
Mount Maunganui/Pāpāmoa councillor Steve Morris, initiator of a call this week for mayor Tenby Powell to resign, traced it back to early rates discussions in March and Powell's infamous profane tirade at first-term councillor Andrew Hollis.
Baldock had the experience to offset Powell's local government inexperience, but the selection ignored history and sent a message to the rest of the council that was anything but unifying.
In his Tauranga political career, Baldock routinely locked horns with some of the re-elected councillors including Morris and John Robson.
The selection could also be viewed as a bit of an insult to Kelvin Clout, who two previous Tauranga mayors had considered a safe pair of deputy's hands even though he ran against them.
Powell was lucky he didn't face a vote to remove Baldock on the spot.
That came later.
The May 19 meeting
The May 19 council meeting set off a brief, damaging contest to see who could use obscure rules most cleverly to score political points.
Councillors were already complaining about Baldock's chairing of informal meetings, so his use of Standing Orders to initiate an early end to a debate about Elizabeth St went over as well as you'd expect.
Three councillors walked out and others protested. Comments at the time - and texts and emails released later - appeared to reveal fury on what was framed as an assault on democracy and free speech.
In my opinion, setting aside the irony of Baldock acting as the meeting efficiency enforcer after spending hours serenading the microphone in the last term, the bungled move just seemed pointlessly petty.
The protest walkout by Morris, Hollis and first-term councillor Dawn Kiddie that followed wasn't much better.
It's hard to do a good storm-off over Zoom.
Shortly after came the "letter of requisition" from six councillors (including the walk-outs), lodged under the Local Government Act and, again, those pesky Standing Orders, seeking a meeting to remove Baldock as deputy mayor.
It was a move aimed at damaging Powell as much as Baldock, trying to force him to accept a deputy of the council's democratic choosing - Robson, most likely - rather than his own.
The "democracy" argument held little water with me - saddling the mayor with a deputy he would not trust seemed like a recipe for making him less inclusive, not more. It was simply another way to get at him.
Before the meeting could be held, Baldock fell on his sword and resigned, and Powell convinced Tina Salisbury to take the hospital pass.
That might have been the end of it, for the time, if it wasn't for the LGOIMA.
Tensions simmered back down, and the council made it through the Annual Plan budget setting process with barely a scrap, no evidence of bloc-voting.
But a few weeks later an official information request response containing hundreds of elected members' texts and emails from the tense May/June period was released, publicly.
The grim reality of the relationships and thoughts of some elected members was exposed to a degree rarely seen in local politics. It was headline news, splashed on Facebook and widely embarrasing.
There were some encouraging signs in yesterday's meeting - including Powell's promise to work on his reactionary tendencies - but I also saw little evidence of anyone forgiving and forgetting. Grudges continued to be nursed.
But this is their last chance.
If they can't find a way to stop the personal attacks and petty politicking to focus on the work at hand, in my opinion they've got to go.