Since you - the council - ask, I am not happy about subsidising a developer to make a handsome profit out of Shelly Bay. But you didn't ask me.
I wouldn't give a developer the froth off my latte, let alone the chance to build an eyesore on what ought to be prime land for everyone to enjoy, but will most likely become yet another posh city playground for the poor to gawp at as they're hurried through with their icecreams dripping.
We're told Wellington ratepayers will be $1.5 million a year richer in rates if the plan goes ahead, which it's bound to, but what is $1.5m worth in a decade or two? And we are asked to share the cost of expensive infrastructure as part of the developer's covert deal with the council. Just how much money that involves we don't know, nor will we - the public - ever see a percentage breakdown. Why not? It's our money.
Oh, and the whole thing will rain down $396m worth of economic benefits while it's being built. Like that wonderful shopping centre on the waterfront - remember? That failed so quickly you could have blinked, but the council just knew it would work. Like it knew the mysterious waka house on the waterfront would. Whose idea was that, and what is its function, exactly?
Shelly Bay is currently a rundown group of buildings on a sunny peninsula facing toward town, almost right on the water, and I rather like it the way it is. It could be another Oriental Bay. Or it could be another cheap and ugly development like so many others that have gone before, because in this city, frontier style, nothing has to meet any aesthetic standard. Nor would we ever dream of having an open and transparent process of disposing of such a public asset. People might get in the way.